<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The .info Experiment part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usualcliche.com/the-info-experiment-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usualcliche.com/the-info-experiment-part-1</link>
	<description>Where Domainers Meet Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://usualcliche.com/the-info-experiment-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usualcliche.com/?p=103#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Found this post whilst trying to find more out more information as to whether .info domains can rank just as well as more popular TLDs. Im about to embark on a new system that relies on having large quanitites of sites and the low cost of .info domains are obviously appealing. Would be interesting to know how you are getting on so far in terms of getting them ranked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this post whilst trying to find more out more information as to whether .info domains can rank just as well as more popular TLDs. Im about to embark on a new system that relies on having large quanitites of sites and the low cost of .info domains are obviously appealing. Would be interesting to know how you are getting on so far in terms of getting them ranked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

